All releases of Ant prior to Ant 1.6 do not support XML namespaces. No support basically implies two things here:
xmlnsand
xmlns:prefixare not treated specially, which means that custom tasks and types have actually been able to use such attributes as parameter names. Again, such tasks/types are going to break when namespace support is enabled on the parser.
Use of colons in element names has been discouraged in the past, and using any attribute
starting with xml
is actually strongly discouraged by the XML spec to reserve such
names for future use.
In build files using a lot of custom and third-party tasks, it is easy to get into name
conflicts. When individual types are defined, the build file writer can do some
namespacing manually (for example, using tomcat-deploy
instead of
just deploy
). But when defining whole libraries of types using
the <typedef>
resource attribute, the build file writer has
no chance to override or even prefix the names supplied by the library.
Adding a prefix attribute to <typedef>
might have been
enough, but XML already has a well-known method for namespacing. Thus, instead of adding
a prefix attribute, the <typedef>
and <taskdef>
tasks get a uri attribute, which stores the
URI of the XML namespace with which the type should be associated:
<typedef resource="org/example/tasks.properties" uri="http://example.org/tasks"/> <my:task xmlns:my="http://example.org/tasks"> ... </my:task>
As the above example demonstrates, the namespace URI needs to be specified at least twice: one time as the value of the uri attribute, and another time to actually map the namespace to occurrences of elements from that namespace, by using the xmlns attribute. This mapping can happen at any level in the build file:
<project name="test" xmlns:my="http://example.org/tasks"> <typedef resource="org/example/tasks.properties" uri="http://example.org/tasks"/> <my:task> ... </my:task> </project>
Use of a namespace prefix is of course optional. Therefore the example could also look like this:
<project name="test"> <typedef resource="org/example/tasks.properties" uri="http://example.org/tasks"/> <task xmlns="http://example.org/tasks"> ... </task> </project>
Here, the namespace is set as the default namespace for the <task>
element and all its descendants.
The default namespace used by Ant is antlib:org.apache.tools.ant
.
<typedef resource="org/example/tasks.properties" uri="antlib:org.apache.tools.ant"/> <task> ... </task>
Almost always in Ant 1.6, elements nested inside a namespaced element have the same
namespace as their parent. So if task
in the example above allowed a
nested config
element, the build file snippet would look like this:
<typedef resource="org/example/tasks.properties" uri="http://example.org/tasks"/> <my:task xmlns:my="http://example.org/tasks"> <my:config a="foo" b="bar"/> ... </my:task>
If the element allows or requires a lot of nested elements, the prefix needs to be used for every nested element. Making the namespace the default can reduce the verbosity of the script:
<typedef resource="org/example/tasks.properties" uri="http://example.org/tasks"/> <task xmlns="http://example.org/tasks"> <config a="foo" b="bar"/> ... </task>
Since Ant 1.6.2, elements nested inside a namespaced element may also be in Ant's default namespace. This means that the following is now allowed:
<typedef resource="org/example/tasks.properties" uri="http://example.org/tasks"/> <my:task xmlns:my="http://example.org/tasks"> <config a="foo" b="bar"/> ... </my:task>
Attributes are only used to configure the element they belong to if:
Since Ant 1.9.1 two attribute namespaces ant:if
and ant:unless
are available to allow you to insert elements conditionally.
Other attributes are simply ignored.
This means that both:
<my:task xmlns:my="http://example.org/tasks"> <my:config a="foo" b="bar"/> ... </my:task>
and
<my:task xmlns:my="http://example.org/tasks"> <my:config my:a="foo" my:b="bar"/> ... </my:task>
result in the parameters a and b being used as parameters to
configure the nested config
element.
It also means that you can use attributes from other namespaces to markup the build file with extra metadata, such as RDF and XML-Schema (whether that's a good thing or not). The same is not true for elements from unknown namespaces, which result in a error.
Now comes the difficult part: elements from different namespaces can be woven together under
certain circumstances. This has a lot to do with the Ant
1.6 add type introspection rules: Ant types and tasks
are now free to accept arbitrary named types as nested elements, as long as the concrete type
implements the interface expected by the task/type. The most obvious example for this is
the <condition>
task, which supports various nested conditions, all of
which extend the interface Condition
. To integrate a custom
condition in Ant, you can now simply <typedef>
the condition, and then use
it anywhere nested conditions are allowed (assuming the containing element has a
generic add(Condition)
or addConfigured(Condition)
method):
<typedef resource="org/example/conditions.properties" uri="http://example.org/conditions"/> <condition property="prop" xmlns="http://example.org/conditions"> <and> <available file="bla.txt"/> <my:condition a="foo"/> </and> </condition>
In Ant 1.6, this feature cannot be used as much as we'd all like to: a lot of code has not yet been adapted to the new introspection rules, and elements like Ant's built-in conditions and selectors are not really types in 1.6. This is expected to change in Ant 1.7.
The new AntLib feature is also very much integrated with the
namespace support in Ant 1.6. Basically, you can "import" Antlibs simply by using a
special scheme for the namespace URI: the antlib
scheme, which expects the
package name in which a special antlib.xml file is located.